1. Note the similarities to the first encounter between God and Satan. A very rigid formula is used in describing their relationship.4. Satan is given his final opportunity to attack Job and has only one limitation: he must guard Job's life. The word guard/rm;v' is used in other contexts of people watching/tending the following things: Adam tending the garden (Gen. 2:15); man obeying the commandments of God (Exodus 34:11); a person watching his own soul (Dt. 4:9); a man guarding another man's life (I Kings 20:39); a man observing another man's life to imitate it (Psalm 37:37); a man guarding what he says (Micah 7:5). In this context it is used as in I Kings 20:39. If that text is examined notice that there is a penalty to pay for allowing the other person's life to be lost. Here are two questions that need to be pondered: 1) Could Satan disobey God at this point? 2) What would be the penalty?
2. Some additions have been made that advance the story.a. In verse three God adds this to his evaluation of Job, "He persists in his integrity still; you achieved nothing by provoking me to ruin him." The first part (He persists in his integrity still) has two terms which need to be considered (persists and integrity).3. Satan appears in verse 4 appears to quote an otherwise unknown proverb to God. The meaning is obvious that a man may lose what he has and still remain righteous, but that is only to save his own hide. Satan in his request wants God to strike more than the 'skin' for he says strike his bone and his flesh.i. The first is hazaq/qz:x' (participle) and is the word used in Exodus for Pharaoh hardening/strengthening his heart against God. The fact that it is a participle shows that the author meant to convey to the reader continuance. Here it is used of Job strengthening his integrity against the adversity of the situation.b. God borrows a word from Satan's vocabulary and turns it back on him. Earlier Satan had asked a rhetorical question which demanded a no answer and said, "Does Job fear God for nothing?" His meaning was that Job gets paid to do it and would not do it unless he did. Here God points out that He (God) allowed this to happen for no cause (for nothing).ii. The second, integrity/hM'Tu, is related to the second term (tam/upright), but is the abstract noun. It is found only in Job and Proverbs (Job 2:3, Job 2:9, Job 27:5, Job 31:6, Prov. 11:3)
5. Why would God sort of cave into Satan's plan in the first place? To justify His actions toward Job and thus justify himself? To magnify and glorify a faithful servant? To bring about growth in the servant?